this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
22 points (71.2% liked)
Progressive Politics
4823 readers
400 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Platner even winning the primary is damaging to the oligarchs. Him saying wealth taxes and Medicare for All and out polling Collins is bad for them even if he's forced out.
They had a candidate who would be in their pocket. She lost the primary. And if they wanted someone to lose to Collins, she was doing that too.
And if you think this is all an oligarch plan, then this woman's accusations now are at their behest and thus suspect. You can't think she's a sincere victim just acting on her own timetable and also that this is a planned downfall.
Did you even read the article? They validated the heck out of her story.
There's little chance of finding another electable candidate, getting them sufficiently funded, awareness & trust built, etc. in time to beat Collins. That was the plan.
So is she truthful or is she a tool of the oligarchs?
~~She's a tool, but it's a case of "the evil you know is better than the one you don't."~~
EDIT: Wait - do you mean Collins, or the accuser? My initial response was for Collins, the accuser seems on the up & up from the reporting. Read the article for yourself & decide.
She seems credible and at least as reported without ulterior motive, which is why saying she's been part of a long plan by the oligarchs doesn't make sense. The timing is a little suspicious, but people have emotions, which could even include releasing something when it's most damaging to someone who's wronged you.
The only avenue available for Platner's win to be an oligarch plan was if they knew for sure this would come out at a politically advantageous time, which would only be true if she was colluding with them for months.
She wasn't specifically part of the plan, they just knew his problematic past would inevitably blow up his campaign (and if it didn't happen by itself, then I'm sure they had something in reserve for the usual "October Bombshell").
The timing was likely caused by conflict within her - does she inevitably make herself a national spectacle (and target for some), or does she allow someone with questionable scruples to get into a position of power? I know I'd have difficulty with that choice.
Platner winning wasn't the plan - blowing up any credible challenge to Collins was.