this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)
Programming
27627 readers
218 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Rustc is built atop llvm, and there's been a lot of work on the GCC front-end. Your comment makes the situation sound worse than it is
I don't see how LLVM helps with bootstrapping.
Yes, it helps with supporting newer platforms, since LLVM is a big project and will probably have support for the new platforms relatively fast.
But as long as any part of the whole process is in rust, it means that you need a rust compiler to build the rust compiler, thus needing to solve the bootstrapping problem.
Of course, every compiler has this issue (even if not self-hosted, you still have to bootstrap the compiler of the language your language is written in).
The only solution for this is to have a compiler-chain where the first level is a simple compiler that can be relatively easily written in the assembly language of the new platform.
EDIT: or of course I could've read any other comment. Of course you can use one of the intermediate representations that are portable to build the first compiler. In which case you don't need a rust compiler, just need LLVM. Makes sense then.