Linux

14281 readers

300 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

212

You paid me, a long-time Linux user, to use Windows 11 exclusively for a month: here’s how it went (www.osnews.com)

submitted 3 days ago by cm0002@libretechni.ca to c/linux@programming.dev

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you used the GUI app you probably wouldn't see that your system uses different package standards

[–] fruitcantfly@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The GUI that came with my distro only covers 2 of the 4 package managers I mentioned. And I'd have to use a GUI

[–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Is there a good reason to use more package managers? When I need packages that aren't provided by the distro I'm using, I change distro

[–] fruitcantfly@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

Yes. Firstly because no distro has everything in their respositores, and secondly because different package managers serve different purposes.

The closest to an all-encompassing package manager is perhaps Arch with AUR, though you are forced to use tools beyond pacman if you want actual package management for the AUR packages. AUR has also shown itself to be a massive liability, since the only way the project has been able to cover as much software as it does, is by doing next to no vetting of the submitted packages. With predictable results