this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
403 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

86252 readers
3634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] littleomid@feddit.org 49 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

When I have vacation, I don’t want to be bothered with work related stuff either. I understand their want for a vacation, and they should not be blamed. The system that allows this chicanery is at fault here.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The total vote count required shouldn't change if someone's on vacation.

If they can't vote remotely or by proxy, then the vote should either be delayed or extended, or anyone absent should be listed as not present or abstained. Either way the percentage of "yes" votes shouldn't be any different from if every seat was in attendance.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Never heard of a parliament where abstain = no. Is that common?

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

If there's a threshold needed for a "yes" vote then it's functionally the same, even without counting as one. I'm just saying that threshold shouldn't go down just because someone is on vacation.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 40 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't want to be bothered while on vacation either, but if something happens at work that needs my specific attention someone will find me.

For fuck's sakes we can't be taking server rooms more seriously than democracy.

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I’m sorry but you’re enabling this behavior. When I take an official holiday, I’m unavailable for work, simple as that. Work is a part of my life, not the definition of my life.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 4 hours ago

As per Wikipedia on the topic.

As of July 1, 2019, the monthly salary is of €8,932.86, or just over €107,000 per year.[15] MEPs also receive a general expenditure allowance of €4,563 per month.[15]

If I can be called in from vacation for €43k a year, these cunts can come in to vote for the fucking future of democracy for €107k.

Is it right to interrupt vacations? No. Does it matter in this case? Also the fuck no. The thing happened! They weren't there! If they want better rights or whatever I guess they should fucking unionise or whatever. Sitting out on a vote of this magnitude is beyond reprehensible.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I agree. I guess what I didn't say is that I do a bunch of work on the clock in order to ensure 99% of my responsibilities are covered. And then even the other 0.9% my coworkers can just deflect or work around.

But if a situation arises that actually hurts people imo that is no longer a work issue but a humanity issue, and if my fellows can't handle it then I do want to be made aware.

If this a regular occurrence then there needs to be some way to block or mitigate the damage, so that people can go on vacation and not worry they're coming back to a mess.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In this case, this is a thing that can be postponed

I can agree if they called them because "OH NO ALL OUR PEOPLE ARE DYING WHAT DO WE DOO" but it's not

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

I guess I'm not European so I don't know that much about this process. It sounded serious, but if it can be postponed then yeah postpone.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

When a server is down, they want to find you. When they want to pass a law which you will vote against, how hard do you think they're trying?

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

I mean how are there not people in your office, people you work next to, people who know about which issues you ought to be made aware of, that can reach out to you?

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 16 points 17 hours ago

It's not a regular job though. They know what they're getting into.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t want to be bothered with work related stuff either. I understand their want for a vacation, and they should not be blamed

Have you ever heard the phrase, "With great power comes great responsibility"? Yes, it's from some dumb capeshit, but it's true. If you want to be elected into a position of such power, then you're voluntarily signing up for the responsibility, including the responsibility to keep shit like this from happening when you go on vacation.

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Vacation is vacation. They have a right to a vacation just like I do. The system should have safeguards in place. I don’t want the elected to have a burnout, just in the same way that I don’t want to have a burnout.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 7 points 16 hours ago

Right there should be, but there isn't, so until there is they need to have someone from their office on the spot to field important stuff like this.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago

The difference beeing is that.they do not have attendence requirements, which i am sure you do at your work, can't just not show up.