this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
543 points (97.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40814 readers
4806 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 75 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

In this context, the translation is absolutely correct in my opinion. I can't really think of a context where "lolicon" being translated to pedophile would be incorrect. -con like siscons, brocons, etc are complexes or obsessions. Lolicon is a complex or obsession with, drawn or not, prepubescent minors.

Loli, not lolicon, can refer to both an individual who looks like the target of a lolicon (a prepubescent minor), or is short for Lolita fashion, which is meant to be a cute fashion style inspired by Victorian-era dress with archetypes like goth-loli.

For those wondering why Japan, a very shame based culture, feels more accepting of this, and why it seemingly appears in anime/manga culture so much, CSAM possession was legal, technically, up to 2014. CSAM production and dissemination only started being legislated in 1999, with much pressure from the west. Again, it is absolutely abhorrent and a crime, but culturally in Japan, many feel they are being forced to adapt at a rapid pace. There's a tangential relation between western conservatives and Japan when it comes to acceptance and cultural change (I wasn't referring to pedocon theory, but hey, it's a theory like gravity at this point with it being proven each passing month.)

Bonsai Pop's video on the Rurouni Kenshin mangaka goes into detail on this as he was found with a massive collection of this material. Which, again, was legal for him to own 3 years prior (he was arrested in 2017) regardless of how ethically abhorrent it was. Which it absolutely is. I believe his case was a case of hurt people hurt people in that he was abused as a minor and developed his complex. He never directly harmed children as far as we know, but he did own a large CSAM collection, which absolutely furthers a climate in which exploitation thrives. It's believed he was likely being used as an example by the state given how public the arrest was while how minor the punishment was.

[–] PlasmaSnake@lemmy.world 0 points 17 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

I disagree. A lolicon can also be defined as a person into lolicon, with no interest in actual children. Since she's holding a lolicon manga, this would be a valid interpretation. Whether it would be a more correct translation, I don't know

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

He never directly harmed children as far as we know

I absolutely loathe the entire apologist view of "They never directly harmed a child, they just had 45tb of pictures of children being harmed"

Buying/trading CSAM material IS directly harming children, because your activities are actively creating and furthering a demand for children to be molested and raped, Which very much means your hand is actively causing the harm, whether its directly against the child, or every other activity that creates the market that encourages molestation and rape. everyone participating in it is actively and directly harming children.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I don't disagree.

I was merely stating it as a fact of the case in why he, potentially, only received a light fine and no jail time. That's on the Japanese court system.

The American system is nearly as bad (arguably worse) so long as you are wealthy and/or have political power.

Because yes, everyone involved, both directly and indirectly, create the climate in which exploitation thrives.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Buying/trading CSAM material IS directly harming children, because your activities are actively creating and furthering a demand for children to be molested and raped,

i get your argument, but who says they paid for it?

[–] lovely_reader@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not the person you're talking to, but in today's attention economy-centric society, there are more currencies supporting "content" markets than just money.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

No one? I assume you are assuming so due to me using the word market.

While it paying for it certainly exists, there is also trading. He could have easily traded for it.

Besides,the why or what he exchanged for it is irrelevant to the point that he was a fucking pedophile that had a metric fuckton of CSAM.