this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
241 points (96.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

40459 readers
1288 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If that could translate to ad buys, it would mean I'd only see advertisements for scams, because I have no money for anything else.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

omg I'm not sure if this is exactly what you meant but,

I would love a metric above their head that states how many times an advertisement has actually worked on them, vs how many they have seen.

I think it would revolutionize the way we see ads today, because I think almost everyone would have significantly low numbers.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think everyone knows that advertising is relatively ineffective on a per-view basis, but they're hoping it at least pays for itself...

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yea, but im hoping the constant re-enforcement that it doesn't work will sway them away from wanting to spend on advertisement in the first place.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That would have interesting knock-on effects for ad-supported services....

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yea, I do agree we would see more services become paywalled as a result. Not that that would be a bad thing though, not every site would go that route, the main reason sites don't already is because they know that the typical user isn't going to pay money to access their site, they will just go elsewhere.

The way I can see it, the ad supported model would go away, then branch into a few ways:

  1. Sites opt for a paywall on the individual scale; but this won't work as the everyday user isn't going to spend $ on every site they visit, so they will just visit sites that don't force a paywall
  2. Sites opt into selective pay packages/subscriptions kind of like how cable worked, where you pay one provider, and it gets distributed across sites based on how much traffic each site got that was involved. I'm unsure how I feel about this route. If it's done right I wouldn't mind but, if it ends up being insane pricing like how cable was I wouldn't participate.
  3. Sites tone down the amount of ads, as the only thing they are making money on now is user data tracking, which doesn't need a bunch of different ads on the system and also doesn't really require user interaction.
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The two examples we have aren't great: video streaming and newspapers.

For video streaming, they try to create as much of a monopoly as possible and then extract value from you--enshittification. And even at this early stage, it's not the "ad-free" tier it's "ad-free^*^" tier.

For newspapers, rich people just buy them and blatantly use it for propaganda; they're willing to operate at an official loss if it saves them from regulation or taxes.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Honestly, the ad-free* tiers is what is making me want to do away with ads the most. I don't mind paying for a service, I do mind paying for a service just to get ads anyway. The double dipping is so annoying.

It's becoming increasingly difficult to find a service provider that isn't actively forcing ads into premium tiers.