this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
116 points (96.0% liked)
Programming
28194 readers
248 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
LLMs also enables managers and businesses who want to make money with shitty products, which is probably a higher detriment to code quality than the low-level difficulties of programming ever was.
Either way, IMO the prime use of AI, including LLMs, is mass surveillance. And no, that's not a good thing.
Agreed. I see some good use cases for the tech but the surveillance is obviously disproportionately bad.
Yeah for sure. Facial recognition as used in mass surveillance AFAIK uses very similar machine learning tech you can use quite successfully (AFAIK) to aid diagnostics in medicine, environmental conservationism etc.
i find it funny how people freak out over Cambridge analytica, but when you change the name to AI and increase the data 1000x from just stealing user data from facebook to user data on every service "everyone seems to love it" and feed it more data.
Machine learning was being used for security/traffic cameras for years before LLMs or Flock so yeah. Detecting patterns/shapes in images and text is what this tech was created for.
How is LLM facilitating mass surveillance (except help build nasty data processing tools). Reading through unstructured ingested data?
I'm guessing they meant AI in general
Facial recognition, gait recognition etc. (i.e. a different kind of machine learning) is probably more important for surveillance, but LLMs can play a role, too. Websites, unencrypted messengers, email servers etc. have been collecting craptons of text data, but before LLMs it was fairly difficult to analyse all of it if you don't have a place to start like "user username with IP address xxx.yyy.zzz.pp called the president a butthole on dd/mm/yyyy". You could always filter for keywords, but people get creative about it, which is substantially harder when LLMs are used for analyzing. So yeah, "nasty data processing tools", and that's actually a big issue because of how nicely it slots into the network of mass data collection that companies have been building for targeted advertising (or so they say, to me it was always clear that a lot of them were already using it for more nefarious purposes).
And e.g. I assume that you can identify most people just by their writing style across tens of otherwise unrelated accounts.
Also, it's not like you can't use the hardware that's training or running LLMs for other kinds of machine learning.