this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
370 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

70107 readers
2350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The issue is there’s a million books out there with no audio and never will. Im ok with Ai doing readings on books that wouldn’t otherwise get an audio version

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah i can see worls of non fiction being a good candidate.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but it is still lame for a company like Audible to expect people to pay for their service and then they decide to cut costs by switching to AI voices. They can afford to hire actors to read their books. They have no excuse to go do that.

Meanwhile what you're talking about if books and stories that may not get to be picked to be narrated and well, I can see where ai voices could be a benefit in those cases. Especially for people with dyslexia.

I just disagree with a company that sells itself on narrated books and then they go and have robots read their shit? Why should anyone pay for that? Because I'm sure their prices wouldn't go down either.

And when all is said and done, personally, I just prefer that a human being is reading to me. Especially if it is fiction.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Does audible actually do the audiobooks? I assumed it was the publishers. Sometimes the books i want aren’t available on audio which I listen to while working

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I assumed they did. Maybe not all, to be fair, but I am pretty sure they have produced audio recordings of books in the past(?)

Maybe I'm just tripping, I dunno.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Its not that audible hires the narator themselves more like they just ways of putting writers in Touch with narrators

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 0 points 3 days ago

There are Audible originals that you can only get on their platform. Audiobook sellers like libro.fm and streamers like Storytel don’t get access to those.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

With machine voice with no attempts at imitate human's intonation - yes.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Hey for the deaf and people who need the info on the page, robot voice is better than nothing.

Just pretend the book is being narrated by Stephen Hawking!

[–] jungle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Audiobooks for the deaf? Excuse me?

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 0 points 3 days ago

Sign language books. Now there’s a hole in the market 😆

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Accessibility and performance art are separate categories