this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
644 points (98.3% liked)

World News

46597 readers
1608 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its root is in physical intimidation before battle yes, but on the floor of parliament it's clearly intended as an act of cultural display of resistance, not one of "do as we say or we will hurt you".

The modern suit comes from military uniforms. Hell, they have a guy with a mace when parliament is in session. This military imagery has come to the authority of the democratic process and appears at least throughout the anglosphere, but it's using military imagery to do so.

Just as the colonizer uses military imagery to represent the authority and tradition of institutions, the colonized may use their own military imagery to represent opposition to colonial acts.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes there's lots of ceremonial aspects to parliament and if they wanted to include more maori tradition into it, I'd be all in favour.

This is akin to randomly bellowing out the national anthem in the middle of a voting session but with more bite. I'd expect somebody doing that to be sanctioned too.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

This is akin to randomly bellowing out the national anthem in the middle of a voting session but with more bite. I'd expect somebody doing that to be sanctioned too.

With the harshest punishment ever given within their government?