this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
345 points (91.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

28296 readers
358 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Krita, definitely, though it's still not as complete in capability it's a much better analogue

[–] thal3s@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Seconded. Krita is significantly easier to use then GIMP.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

how exactly do you do image editing in krita?

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren't made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Isn't krita for painting and photoshop for photo editing? Does krita do RAW, color grading and such?

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

yes they are two different use cases.