Programming

28534 readers

445 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

Recommendations for opensource Jetbrains equivalents? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 month ago by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Equivalents because VSCode and its forks are not an equivalent.

TL;DR Jetbrains is getting worse, more like VSCode. I want out to something as powerful but not VSCode like (which is worse).

Jetbrains has been chasing VSCode's popularity to the detriment of its own product.

The modal commit dialog is now opt-in, behind a nearly hidden, advanced parameter and will be removed in the not so distant future. This was part of their effort to make the UI "leaner" and more like VSCode so now Jetbrains IDEs look more like it.

Some keyboard shortcuts have also had to be changed to be more like VSCode.

Jetbrains used to have a good docker integration, but that's either unmaintained or undergoing work to support dev-containers better - something that jetbrains practically had nearly a decade ago, which allowed you to code on another server (remote development).

AI Assistant and Junie (their coding agents which I have to use for work) have consistently been behind the curve and just keep getting worse. They have 2 separate products for agentic development and can't decide which to keep, so they duplicate efforts and fail at both. Now I'm asking my employer to just give me Cursor like the rest of the team, so I don't have to put up with this Jetbrains crap.

Privately, AI it's non-starter anyway, but my guess is that Jetbrains is also focussing more development efforts on that than actually fixing existing bugs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fruitcantfly@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's worth noting that there's a single toggle that, to my knowledge, turns off all AI features in Zed. So if you do not object to the presence of this functionality, but simply do not want to use it, then you're probably better off just sticking with upstream.

However, I'm not sure what you mean by "GitHub integration", so that may not be covered. If you simply mean Copilot support, then that is also disabled by the aforementioned toggle

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Integration" was probably the wrong word to use. My understanding (I've never used their AI so might be wrong) is that you authenticate to Zed's AI service with your GitHub account. I don't believe it actually allows you to interface with GitHub from Zed. I disabled the AI toggle when I used Zed and I still had the prompt to sign in to GitHub.

[–] fruitcantfly@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you mean the "Sign in" button on the top right, then yeah, I've just been staunchly ignoring that. But it turns out that there's also toggle to remove it, so now it's gone!

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Oh nice, I didn't know about the toggle.

I'm happy with Gram; it's more aligned with what I want from an editor and from a foss tool, and it is actively maintained. But I understand if others prefer to use Zed because of the larger user base/dev team.