this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
360 points (98.9% liked)

Linux Gaming

27355 readers
7 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

Help:

Launchers/Game Library Managers:

General:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://steamcommunity.com/app/1867240/discussions/0/573792728906914951/?ctp=6#c588434795636287991
https://www.protondb.com/app/1867240
There will be one more playtest from August 21–23. To receive an invitation, register via Steam or player.gg
https://x.com/HowardPhilpott/status/2082040132425650683 - steam deck gameplay

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I didn't realize it was literally a switch, I thought it had something to do with the architecture of the OS and anticheat programs weren't compatible.

[–] fhein@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I suspect people are thinking about a statement from a game developer who said that enabling EAC support for a Proton is just a checkbox. But I'm fairly sure that only exists because the EAC developers have made a version specifically for Proton. Wardogs uses EAC so it's all good, but it's not generally true for all anti-cheats.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Specifically, it's that linux doesn't allow someone a gilded-path method to ursurp control of your computer like windows does. The 'switch' in this case is turning off where it tries to, effectively, hack your computer to give control of it to the company installing the anti-cheat. We have a name for that type of program- it's called a rootkit, and it's a major security vulnerability that game companies are trying to rebrand so they can save money on client-side anti-cheat instead of spending money on server-side anti-cheat.

For the record, it's a losing battle- client side anticheat will NEVER be reliable- it literally can't, because at the end of the day you still physically have your computer.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It does. The switch in some anticheats is to just not require that on linux. Also not all anticheats are kernel-level in the first place.