Programming

28194 readers

275 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

-13

Torvalds: AI Is the New Compiler, Not the New Programmer - “100% of their code Is written by compilers too" (pbxscience.com)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org to c/programming@programming.dev

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

At the Linux Foundation’s Open Source Summit, the Linux creator argued that AI-written code claims are misleading — and warned that a wave of low-quality, AI-generated bug reports is quietly burning out the maintainers who keep open source running.

[...]

Speaking on stage, Torvalds said the framing misses an obvious historical parallel. Compilers have translated essentially all shipped source code into machine code for decades, he noted, yet no engineer describes their software as “compiler-written.” AI, in his view, belongs in the same category — a powerful productivity layer sitting on top of human design and understanding, not a replacement for it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Personally, I think even if AI tools can possibly used meaningfully and productively by experienced Linux kernel developers - people which have decades of experience with scrutinizing complex code that other programmers wrote -

.... it will likely be an utter disaster in hands of average companies which are already ridden by technical debt, have no specs, no testing, no designed architecture, and will try to use AI to simply cut more corners and produce a higher volume of far worse code with cheaper hires. This will not end well for them.

(There is the argument that AI already "produces code that is better than typical code from the average mid/junior developer". I do not think this holds water, because it can't produce good code alone - this returns to the core of Torvalds argument.)