this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
214 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

6018 readers
389 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Imagine all that effort put into catching someone smashing a stupid camera, it could've been used on a pedophile or something.

You've been warned, they're high on the lookout for Flock vandals now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Great info. I only vaguely recall seeing some youtube videos or something showing that DVD or Bluray lasers could damage CCDs, but it was almost certainly in a desktop-lab situation, at a range of only a few meters. Inverse-square law strikes again!

Solar panels.. yes, target the power source not the electronics themselves (then again, why not both?)

Small kamikaze drones launched from a safely out-of-view location? Now we're getting into full insurrection territory.

No matter what the method, they're going to get legislation classifying it as 'terrorism' I am sure.

[–] trebach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

Drones have a registration number attached to it so that would need to be removed. They're also FAA regulated so they'll slap some felony charges on there.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Small kamikaze drones launched from a safely out-of-view location?

For a 'small' kamikaze drone, I'd recommend experimenting with lighter-than-air flight -- balloons/blimps. You could make a small radio controlled blimp with significant lift capacity for far cheaper than you could build a quadcopter-style drone with the same payload capacity. And they should work well as long as you're not dealing with excessive wind.

And your balloon/blimp can be filled with cheaper, more effective hydrogen rather than helium (much more expensive and less lifting capacity) or hot air (much less lifting capacity). Since it's meant to be disposable, nobody cares about the risk of it catching fire and burning/exploding. Hell, that might actually contribute to its destructive capabilities. Hydrogen is so easy to get that you can feasibly just make it yourself with simple hardware store parts.

You don't need fancy control electronics, either. Any toy RC car's parts could be repurposed for it, including battery and motors.