Egypt was never attempting to attack Israel, but I am just saying they created a fake excuse, having a base doesn't mean there will be an eminent attack. I believe in economical and diplomatic preasure until there is a real eminent threat

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 0 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

Egypt was never attempting to attack Israel

And it was never trying to help NATO amass their troops to attack Pissrael.
So, in short, you brought up a completely irrelevant event and keep refusing to answer the original question.

having a base doesn’t mean there will be an eminent attack.

Ah yes, the most prolific invader in the world, while being known for attacking after amassing troops for such attacks, is apparently not likely to do so in this particular case is what you are saying.

I believe in economical and diplomatic preasure until there is a real eminent threat

What "economical" and "diplomatic" pressure was Russia able to put on NATO without crippling itself?

Again, what should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world (which Egypt is not) starts amassing weapons and troops on that state's border?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

the most prolific invader in the world is the terrorist state of Israel which also have good relation with Russia. It is relevant to say that both used the same excuse to invade . We all know that both consider the people they occupy fake and claim that the perspective identity of Palestinians and Ukrainians do not existing