this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
503 points (93.3% liked)

linuxmemes

32597 readers
1573 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry of any kind will not be tolerated. This is an LGBTQ+-friendly community -- if that is a problem for you, you should leave.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves / tolerates / hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 3 years ago
    MODERATORS
     

    EDIT: For some context, I recently gave podman another go. I have a few services on my homelab server set up in docker containers, so I tried migrating to podman.

    After the second major bug (open issue on github) I encountered looked like it would require completely dropping using compose files to work around, I gave up and went back to docker.

    I like the idea of podman, but it’s just not stable. I’ll try again in a year or so.

    As a bonus, docker’s CLI is significantly nicer.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] lena@gregtech.eu 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Docker is open source though. Docker desktop is not.

    [–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    So, the Docker engine is free, just not the software under certain stipulations. See I don't like that. A weird caveat for using it.

    [–] lena@gregtech.eu 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    What do you mean? I don't see any CLAs or anything like that in the source code.

    https://github.com/moby/moby

    https://github.com/docker/cli

    [–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    This NOTICE in both repos is weird asf:

    Docker Copyright 2012-2017 Docker, Inc.

    This product includes software developed at Docker, Inc. (https://www.docker.com/).

    This product contains software (https://github.com/creack/pty) developed by Keith Rarick, licensed under the MIT License.

    The following is courtesy of our legal counsel:

    Use and transfer of Docker may be subject to certain restrictions by the United States and other governments. It is your responsibility to ensure that your use and/or transfer does not violate applicable laws.

    For more information, please see https://www.bis.doc.gov/

    See also https://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html and/or seek legal counsel.

    Also, they do limit some kind of uses if you don't pay.

    [–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

    Use and transfer of Docker may be subject to certain restrictions by the United States and other governments. It is your responsibility to ensure that your use and/or transfer does not violate applicable laws.

    That's true of all software. It may be subject to restrictions by governments. But in this case, it seems to refer to the fact that the US restricted export of cryptographic software, and seemingly continues to restrict. See also Bernstein v. United States.

    [–] lena@gregtech.eu 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    Also, they do limit some kind of uses if you don't pay.

    You mean Docker Desktop?

    Also iirc all software developed in the USA is subject to those restrictions.

    [–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    …iirc all software developed in the USA is subject to those restrictions.

    Oh, well, I didn't knew about that, yeah.

    You mean Docker Desktop?

    And, in part yes, but these restrictions also apply to docker-cli and moby, although to a lesser extent

    [–] lena@gregtech.eu 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    And, in part yes, but these restrictions also apply to docker-cli and moby, although to a lesser extent

    What restrictions? The ones on all US software or something else?

    [–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

    As is evident just from the link at the bottom of the notice, it's about US export controls on cryptographic software, which is a source of contention since the nineties.

    [–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    No, I mean, for anything beyond personal, non-commercial use, they do impose restrictions.

    [–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

    It's not about personal or commercial use, it's about whether the government allows exporting cryptographic software. Which it mostly does, but didn't always, and still has some conditions.

    [–] lena@gregtech.eu 1 points 2 days ago

    The Apache License 2.0 does allow commercial use, and basically any other use. Can you say specifically where those restrictions are stated?

    [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

    Docker desktop is not. (open source)

    Which can be a pretty big deal.

    This works out to: The product is unencumbered, but the only reliable installer is encumbered as fuck.

    That's a "no thanks", from me.

    I don't need the sword of "Docker fucking with my colleague's ability to collaborate" hanging over each of my projects.

    I'm not mad at folks using Docker for backwards compatibility. I just don't need to make the problem worse.

    [–] lena@gregtech.eu 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I found Docker pretty easy to install. Though apparently it's harder on windows, where they suggest you just use docker desktop, in which case, yeah, fair point. But I'd just put docker in WSL if I had the misfortune of having to use it on Windows.

    [–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

    That's exactly what I'm doing at work. Works a treat especially since I'm fine with CLI.

    Keep in mind that some WSL configuration might be required for better experience β€” like setting networkingMode to mirrored.


    Sharing code between WSL filesystem and Windows is still somewhat of a hassle.

    But I'd just put docker in WSL if I had the misfortune of having to use it on Windows.

    Oh, thanks! I might try WSL next time, should I be so unfortunate, again.