this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
761 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87447 readers
2825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
761
Flock CEO calls for ‘compromise’ as surveillance company faces growing backlash | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)
submitted 2 days ago by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
225 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The country needs to find a “compromise” between privacy and safety, according to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley.

“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What the US should prioritize is opportunity, education, corporate regulation, housing affordability, justice and dealing with corruption.

Gee, then they wouldn't need the surveillance state.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're right, but all the 1% heard was: you think they should have less yacht money.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I am not even against the yacht money, just fucking STOP with the ARISTOCRATIC behaviors, dynamics, incentives.

I support a wealth cap ample enough to own a yacht, but not enough to make rogue aristocravcy viable. At least for now. The billionaires are doing everything they can to convince me that maybe even the yacht money is too much wealth holding.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Thr yact money is definitely too much.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago

With how things are going now, every day I am more amenable to this line of thinking.