this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
666 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87624 readers
4188 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
666
As Ubuntu embraces AI, Debian discusses banning all AI-generated code (www.xda-developers.com)
submitted 1 day ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
160 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 0x4f1@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ubuntu has a long and storied history of making bad decisions. Why should AI be any different?

[โ€“] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 12 points 20 hours ago

There's nothing about Ubuntu's proposed use of AI that seems bad at all. Using it to improve accessibility is a good thing, especially when it's open source, local-only, and sandboxed. I can't see how having high quality speech-to-text would be a bad decision. Much of that stuff is probably not even considered "AI" by most people.