this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
662 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87624 readers
4453 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 71 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Canonical patronizingly forcing a tool/workflow onto users against their explicit and unequivocal rejection of it?

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's not what the articles says or implies at all. The article only refers to another article with a click bait headline. The article article summarizes Canonical stance like this:

  • Canonical will add AI to Ubuntu — but only cautiously and when it truly makes sense.
  • AI features must be mature, open-source, and run locally when possible.
  • Focus AI on accessibility (speech-to-text, TTS) and improvements, not turning Ubuntu into an 'AI product'.

And to be clear, including a tool or default workflow is MILES away from patronizingly forcing it on to users. It's just the way that most distros that aren't Linux From Scratch work.

[–] noahm@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Problem is, Ubuntu's track record with projects like Upstart, Unity, Mir, Snap, Netplan, Amazon integration, the Rust coreutils rewrite, etc. makes the "only cautiously and where it truly makes sense" promise seem rather hollow.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, distros make different choices about the systems they want to use. That's the way distro work. If you don't like it, choose a different flavor of ubuntu or a different distro altogether. Nobody's being forced to do anything they don't want here. What's the alternative? Everybody just does everything exact the way some armchair developers or Arch cultists have decided is the best way for them? No thanks.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yes. And many users have many times done exactly that.

But I've BEEN there for the bitter, insulting interviews where Shuttleworth STILL moans and complains that Unity was the future and users were too thick to accept his vision. After they realized too many people were switching back to Gnome, they decided to put a stop to that by making Unity the only default installed DE and providing no further support. This is a company run by a man who by all accounts is a petty dictator who still doesn't get it.

I already left Ubuntu. That doesn't mean I don't get to call them out for being heavy handed and pigheaded. Just because something is open source and free does not make it immune to criticism. Just like I am free to go to another distro, Ubuntu's developers are free to ignore my comments.