this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
73 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

50637 readers
459 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If GrapheneOS stops supporting future Pixels, and Motorola is only targeting the flagship market for their compatible phones, we're looking at truly dark days ahead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Well they did lay off a ton of developers in exchange for LLMs. I bet the LLMs are capable of writing secure code anyway. So it's not even on my radar. But now knowing they also cut implementation of MTE means it's even less secure. So either they are refusing to admit their mistakes, or they are bowing to the governments wanting a more hackable device, or both.

Google was being hostile towards open source anyway. So probably good that GrapheneOS skips this one. Maybe even more to a different line of devices that's is not moving in such a proprietary direction. The last few Pixels aren't even much of an upgrade and progressively keep falling behind on a lot of hardware, but the price keeps going up. They just aren't what they used to be, a tech showcase for other companies to be inspired by. So, I'd actually be happy if GrapheneOS moved to another line, though I don't know which would be ideal that actually allows unlocking and locking the boot loader without voiding warranty or actively killing the hardware out of spite but still has high end hardware.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

So probably good that GrapheneOS skips this one. Maybe even more to a different line of devices that’s is not moving in such a proprietary direction.

GrapheneOS didn't support only Pixels because they liked Pixels; they only supported Pixels because Pixels were the only phones that had the necessary security features. Now that Pixels don't have those features either, the number of new phones on the market that are suitable for GrapheneOS has changed from one to zero.

In other words, there is no "different line of devices that’s is not moving in such a proprietary direction" for them to switch to!

(Ignoring the Motorola phone because it doesn't exist yet and there's no actual hard guarantee it ever will, BTW.)