this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

5286 readers
52 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This could led to potentially explosive information about 9/11 and Al-Qaeda.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm suspicious of the timing.

A US military judge has ordered Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the September 11 attacks, and three co-defendants to stand trial, more than two decades after their arrest.

Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Michael Schrama issued the scheduling order on Wednesday, setting opening proceedings for June 5, 2028.

2028 is the next presidential election year and I'm sure Trump would love to say it's happening under his rule because it's his rule and that he's fighting terrorism.

And it has apparently been stalled for a while:

The ruling comes after a US appeals court blocked plea deals that would have let Mohammed and two co-defendants avoid the death penalty.

The case has been stalled for years by disputes over evidence obtained while the men were held in CIA prisons and subjected to torture.

Schrama turned down a prosecution bid to open the trial in early 2027, arguing that timeline wouldn’t leave enough room to work through the disputes.

“A realistic trial date must account for the hearing and resolution of pretrial evidentiary and compliance motions,” he wrote.

Could be coincidence, but I feel there's ample reason to be suspicious here.

[–] ArcticFoxSmiles@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago

You make a lot of sense.