Linux

15114 readers

421 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

686

Debian developer Antoine Le Gonidec resigns after option allowing corporate LLM use without disclosure wins vote (lists.debian.org)

submitted 1 month ago by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/linux@programming.dev

357 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Well what would the disclosure requirement improve? It's unenforceable and it just gets in the way of evaluating the code based on quality. Every code should have high standards. Bad llm code is just as bad as bad human code.

If a project allows llm contributions then disclosing it will only make people wary of the wrong things. Putting a badge on it is not helpful anymore if it's allowed. I have seen good llm code and bad human code.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bad llm code is just as bad as bad human code.

Bad LLM code is worse than bad human code. LLMs sanitize out markers that humans use to catch and correct mistakes.

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 3 points 1 month ago

I have experienced both.

load more comments (7 replies)