this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
201 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

87680 readers
3379 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 71 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

Hackers use LLMs to spot odd exploits so it makes sense developers use them too. The usage of LLMs in development likely won‘t make Linux better or safer overall, because bugs and exploits wouldn‘t have been found by either side without it in the first place. It‘s like pandora‘s box where Linus is kind of forced to use it. If that makes sense.

[–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Like an accelerating arms race.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Yes, but this has always been the case before and after this phony "AI" bullshit.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 13 points 9 hours ago

He might consider himself forced to use it to find bugs. He wouldn't be forced to use it to write the fix.

(Now you might say he wasn't or isn't, but even if that were true for the kernel at large this doesn't seem to be: https://www.theregister.com/os-platforms/2026/08/10/linus-torvalds-says-ai-has-made-huge-linux-kernel-updates-the-new-normal/5285268 And this seems like mostly to be on Linus, for not stepping in here.)

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Following the hacker arm race is a good point. But also the number of bugs is not a bottomless pit. If an LLM allows to find more, and hopefully the test and reviews are good enough to limit the new opportunities to introduce some from LLMs, it should reduce the overall number of bugs and make the software generally safer.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

also the number of bugs is not a bottomless pit.

Are you forgetting about Microsoft?