this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
130 points (98.5% liked)

World News

57903 readers
1422 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It proposed a new goal of limiting the “overshoot” of rising temperatures and eventually figuring out how to undo the temperature gains, a highly uncertain path.

Archived copy of the article

Additional coverage:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

How exactly do you reverse runaway feedback loops?

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

These ones?

We uh, can't.

Not in the timescale that matters to us, with the resources and technological development available at hand.

But generally speaking?

You would need to introduce a different, runaway feedback loop that modifies/cancels/counters the first.

Like fungi did when they learned to eat lignin, or cyanobacteria introduced when they started spitting out that horrible and nasty O2.

Time and scale are what will do us in.

We just didn't pace ourselves at all, societally speaking.

Weren't able to build the chemistry and engineering tools needed to meaningfully expand the scope of the system beyond our planet to access any other resources or solutions beyond it...

And still cannot agree to any meaningful planet side changes that might even remotely allow for later pipedreams, because they need to happen now.

The Futurama ice cube joke is funny, but we can't even attempt anything half as harebrained on a fraction of that scale.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

They're not yet at runaway. If we drop emissons to zero, then temperatures stabilize within a human lifetime

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You realize we're already locked in for between 4-10C in warming, with the highest probability being at 6C, right? That's if you stopped all emissions right now.

We'd be hit with an immediate 1-1.5C in warming as we lose the cooling effect of all the particulates (like diesel exhaust) in the atmosphere, pushing us to +3-3.5C. From there, the natural feedback loops take care of the rest.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

The amount locked in is more like 2°C if we did a crash shift off fossil fuels and meat. Those higher numbers presuppose that people won't forcibly shut down fossil fuel using plants and equipment before the end of its useful life.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

We're almost at 2C already and that's with the cooling effect from all of the particulates.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago

Destroy the nearest star.