this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
162 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

87773 readers
3436 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The quick chargers are where my concerns lie. If every EV stays with that standard plug-it-for-8-hours charger, my question is negated. But that's not what's going to happen, I don't think most grids are ready for that level of mass adoption. I think they can get there with offloading (one commenter said solar chargers for EVs), but we're not all there yet. The revolution implied here will cripple the grid in the short term. Similar to what those "ai" datacenters are doing now, but on a larger scale and in a way that can't be similarly regulated or limited. EVs are the future for sure, but we need to be ready to charge them in every home, and we're not.

And to clarify, I'm not (and wasn't in my original comment) suggesting Evs should be stopped or that they're bad. Only that we must be ready to support them.