this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
284 points (98.0% liked)

World News

57937 readers
2466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 17 hours ago (8 children)

Well, if you're going for fidelity, the planet is not a perfect sphere. Regardless, a 3D map is harder to parse and render so it makes sense to use 2D.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Eh, a 3D sphere with mapping is quite workable. Bing maps can click over an overly detailed globe and the 'sphereness' of it only starts to matter when you zoom out. It's only a bit of a strain because of the texturing, and it's not much of a strain at that.

It would not be crazy to have a more accurate interactive behavior instead of assuming that zooming out enough to see continents should still be flattened out.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, you show a globe, or rather, represent a globe on a 2D surface.

Now you cannot have a single map that shows everything. And your 2D representtion is distorted anyway.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

A very quick turn let's you see the other half. Bonus, you can look at it from the perspective of a pole and get a much better view of the parts of earth that map projections just utterly mangle. Particularly helpful for understanding arctic geopolitics.

The distortion only applies if you take the screen flatness literally, and no one is going to accuse a 3d game of being hopelessly distorted by virtue of being on a flat screen.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

A very quick turn let’s you see the other half.

Okay, I've turned over the paper and the back side is blank.

I think you miss the point that with a globe, you can't easily compare different parts of the earth. Do you truly not understand the advantage of being able to see all of the earth at once? Come on, dude.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)