this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
358 points (99.4% liked)
science
29168 readers
262 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hate to break it to the noobs, but Ballmer has ALWAYS been an asshole, I mean like from the first day. He probably punched his mama in the face once he was out. That's why Gates put him in charge, mistaking sheer arrogance (which he had) as managerial ability (which he absolutely did not have).
He's been a brutal bastard for as long as he's been in business, and had the authors talked to anyone that worked at Microsoft in the 90s they'd have known it. Instead, they write the entire article as though this is just recently happening, which is odd as fuck. It makes me wonder who they are trying to convince, and why.
It's hard to blame acquired wealth when a motherfucker never had an ethic beyond bullying and "fuck you I got mine" anyway.
Yeah, I think they got it in the wrong order. All billionaires are psychopaths, but not all psychopaths are billionaires.
Gates was also an asshole. Fucker bought the rights to what was literally called (internally) as QDOS, or Quick and Dirty Operating System, then turned around and sold it to IBM, as if it was theirs. We got stuck with that shitty foundation for decades, with the many iterations of DOS, Windows 3.1, Windows 9x, etc.
No argument there. Those two were best friends for a long time, and Gates' daughter is following in her daddy's amoral footsteps. It's not accidental Gates was friends with Epstein. They're all alike.
So maybe it’s a cyclic problem. You have to act like a psychopath to become a billionaire. And becoming a billionaire makes you act like a psychopath.
Yep, pretty much. It's made even worse with peer re-enforcement.