this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
381 points (94.0% liked)

memes

23217 readers
2928 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Not really a movie, just some guy followed her around a bit before she went to prison. She isn't inherently interesting, just I think people are fascinated by a twisted mind like this. Especially because the documentary/whatever apparently doesn't paint her in a good light, and she still allowed it. Delusional from start to end.

Surprised you'd never heard of Theranos before though. ColdFusion did a great short doco on it.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

She's also really representative of the tech world of the late 10s on. SBF was juicer in drama, but Holmes is wild in what she managed to get away with and how long it took before anyone noticed it wasn't physically possible to do what she claimed

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

People here missing that Nathan's mind is probably just as twisted, but in a different way.

This movie is going to be a trip.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Late reply. But yeah there are a thousand other tech bros who have done similar things. Taken in investments. lied about their product. even pushed out products to consumers that are potentially dangerous.

I think she got so much attention because 1. She's a woman. And honestly there aren't that many women con artist in the tech industry. There are some. But it's mostly guys.

And 2. She's an attractive woman. (I didn't say she's a super model but she is objectively above average). So makes for good click bait. She looks good on camera.

People love to hate on good looking people who have fallen. Makes "us" all feel better about our shitty place when we see other people with privilege also fail.

Honestly still not sure why there is a movie about her that so heavily features her in it.

Almost comes off as paid for publicity. For sympathy.

There was some other documentary about her a few years ago. Which is when I learned about her. May have been on YouTube or Netflix. I can't recall. But it's out there.

Idk. Should she go to prison. Yes. But she's also one of many that should be in prison for fraud. Yet the system seems to always want to make an example out of the women to give the impression that they are impartial. When their male counterparts do no time.

Another example. Martha Stewart. Did she break the law. Yes. Should she do the time? Yes. At the same time, many of Trump's illegal activities were being reviewed in courts. He never did time even though his were much worse.

Anyway. I don't care to watch any sympathy documentary for criminals.