this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
409 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

88098 readers
3571 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/71321898

Netzpoltik details that police are able to gain access in this way either through physical access to someone’s phone or by intercepting verification codes via a state-sanctioned phishing attack or intercepting SMS messages via telephone surveillance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] time2lose@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (16 children)

Telegram and whatsapp never had encryption. Also - they just give your messages on law enforcement request, always have.

Signal - how does it work with signal again?

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They are a bit vague on this but I suspect all of these attack vectors start with LEOs having physical access to the unlocked phone. They then set up a trusted desktop without the phone owners knowing.

Which is clever, to be fair. Whether or not that's legal is already a court case. The law is so frightfully grey.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its also a failure of the user's access control and operating security.

Once a third party has access to the secure environment, that environment is and will always be compromised.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is the user made aware of this by the operator (signal, telegram, et al)?

If not, it's a big haul to get to competency. The operator should be educating users on how to limit compromise.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

i just logged into signal on my desktop app about 4 hours ago, and about 90 minutes after that i got a message from signal to my phone to inform me about this.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What exactly did they tell you?

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

"hey, somebody logged into your signal account on desktop about an hour ago. might want to check that that was actually you"

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
  1. It NEVER advertises itself as such.

  2. IIRC Signal DOES warn you about this, first when you make an account, and then when you try to save media files, and when you try to start a group chat. The others aren't remotely secure anyway and I have no interest in attempting to defend them.

load more comments (14 replies)