this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
410 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

89506 readers
3184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/71321898

Netzpoltik details that police are able to gain access in this way either through physical access to someone’s phone or by intercepting verification codes via a state-sanctioned phishing attack or intercepting SMS messages via telephone surveillance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

give me a list of messaging apps that stop attacks that leverage physical access.

use a better os that has encryption and kill codes if that's your concern.

[–] vald@mbin.linuxnation.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

give me a list of messaging apps that stop attacks that leverage physical access.

you know what would solve this? simplex.

um...

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

either through physical access to someone’s phone OR by intercepting verification codes via a state-sanctioned phishing attack OR intercepting SMS messages via telephone surveillance

why are you so against people using a more secure way to communicate?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the only time they mention signal is when they explain they used linked devices to obtain signal messages. not SMS! if you lose your phone or whatever, and log in on a new device, your messages won't magically reappear, they are lost, and all your contacts get a warning that your safety numbers have changed.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

simplex messages stay on your phone. you can't switch phones and have them follow you because there's no way to sign in because there's no account for you to sign in with.

simplex doesn't require a phone number or email. the trust is made between users, keeping users safer because it requires physical access between users. sure you can share your code over SMS or otherwise, but that's a user issue that breaks usage policy, not a problem with the software.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

simplex messages stay on your phone

I think that's what I said with signal too. the exception is you can have your messages follow you, if you still have the old phone, because the app supports transferring the data.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if it can transfer the data, there's more opportunity to successfully steal it.

convenience will always negate security.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have bad news for you, simplex also has this "security flaw": https://simplex.chat/docs/guide/managing-data.html

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

cool.

so then signal is just as good as simplex.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Intercepting a verification code with signal does not allow reading messages.