this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
568 points (95.7% liked)

memes

22650 readers
1803 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You watch movies to dissect their meanings, others watch movies to escape reality for a bit.

The dissecting of media (which i do a lot) isn't something i choose - it comes pretty automatically with media literacy. As soon as you develop the skills needed to analyze subtext and themes, and start to take a critical stance regarding video content, you can't really switch it off outside of getting wasted.

So i'd say the difference is simply in media literacy (and more broadly, general education) and level of cognitive impairment.

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's because this is the normal flow of things. Pare the mediums away, and you're left with the same basic core: Stories.

The storyteller always has a reason for telling a story. Even when they are only setting out to entertain.

To be able to separate one's actual feelings, knowledge, and values in order to write a purely entertaining tale, requires that the storyteller be aware of them. At which point they must then take an extra step to insert others.

What stories are, at their heart is the passing of an abstract message or purpose encoded in a surface pattern meant to be cognitively sticky.

The reason might be to teach the young in the tribe the seasonal crop patterns as it was thousands of years ago, as it still is in some places.

Or it could be a commentary on the social state of the times. Or any other thing.

But the other thing a story must be, is engrossing.

A good story must be entertaining or funny or terrifying. It must tug at the emotions of the listener in some way.

That's what makes it stick. That's how stories work.

There is nothing wrong with refusing to dig deeper into the meaning of a tale, especially if it's presented or done poorly. That turns it into a lesson.

But the best stories, it doesn't matter if you seek out the deeper meaning or not.

It'll be there regardless and so will the story, and if and when the listener grows, the meaning will make itself clear on the next recounting.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thank you BBC for the one-sentence-a-paragraph formatting. But none of that explains why people fail to grok the message of the media.

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 1 points 1 day ago

You're welcome. You can grok it if you read what I replied to, and then use media literacy to examine the negative spaces in my response; namely if all I gave are examples of what a story nee--Wait.

You're not being genuine, are you?