this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
155 points (80.9% liked)

Technology

88183 readers
3628 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It still is way slower than any chromium based browser, lacks features that have been standard on chromium for years

I don't think its slower at all. Most of the time same if not faster. Maybe it depends on where you go?

Features in chromium are often there because they are going their own way and not being standard, is that Mozillas fault?

HDR video is in Firefox, HDR images is experimental. Personally I don't care, why would I watch videos in a browser that I think should have HDR?

I will agree that Mistral should have done the lifting, and Firefox need not be working so hard on adding AI. However, if they don't people on the other side of the fence will complain that Chrome gets all the AI, why is Firefox so lazy?