this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
73 points (89.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

41456 readers
1269 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been noting this more recently and it seems to be a trend, at least with people I converse with on the regular. The really religious types aren't animal people or downright dont like them. The more chill or agnostic types seem to be more apt to love animals.

I could go on my theory of this but I'm interested to see if anyone thinks this is a trend.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's not that they don't like animals. It's that they don't view animals as equal to humans. They believe that god made them superior to animals, so what happens to animals doesn't really matter.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

They don't even see minorities as humans

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago

I basically came here to say this. Especially these days basically all good pet owners think of them as their children or at least living beings with rights. And abrahamic religions (I know less about others) view humans as being god's special creatures who have dominion over all others. Same reason there's often more child abuse in religious homes.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess I could have phrased this exact question with "the environment" and probably got the same answers. (Bad) religious people think it's all "theirs" so they can do whatever they want and pollute all they want as "god" will take care of the earth no matter what.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 14 points 23 hours ago

You might want to note that while this probably applies to major religions, it's not all religions

Also this is probably a good representation from the bible

Genesis 1:28 (KJV): "And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth."

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't think an animal's life is of equal value to a human's. I don't think that's a strictly religious view point either. Should they have shot harambe to save that kid, or was that action equivalent to murder?

[–] Onyxonblack@sopuli.xyz 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Typical creature that values it's own species over all others. I really despise this mentality. Anyway have a great day.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world -5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Should they have shot harambe or let it rip the kid in half? Is it your position that all organisms are of equal value?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Congratulations on the false dichotomies.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world -4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

What are the other options ? This is a binary discussion. A human life is of more impact and relevance than an animal's. Therefore it's value is higher. I have a ton of animals, farm and pet, I LOVE my animals. I'd put my girl's life above all of them in a second.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

For your first question: there is no certainty that Harambe would have “ripped the kid in half”.

For your second, you could value some species more than your own and others less, there’s no reason all species must be equally valuable (let alone individuals) Although the idea of thinking about things that way at all is a little gross to me.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world -3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Is it genuinely your belief that the kid would have been fine? Or even any 100% safe solution outside of what happened? What was done ensured the safety of the human child, as it should have. You're misusing false dichotomy. The user I was responding to stated

"Typical creature that values it's own species over all others."

The all or nothing aspect I gave is a direct response to the one they gave. The implication being the user does not value human life over all other life. I do, which is why this started and is ending as a binary conversation. Secondary to that, whats better than what in a tier list is completely irrelevant to the conversation.

You're using too much logic for an emotional thread, lol.

The people who are "animals over humans!!!" or equate them don't love nor care for anybody besides themselves in earnest. They'll stay in their little corner with their pets, shaking in fear just thinking about deep human connections until the day they die. 🤷‍♂️