this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
508 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

16670 readers
1352 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asetru@feddit.org 75 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Maglev isn't even more expensive. High speed rails that are built "to spec" for 400 km/h are expensive as fuck. Trains are usually shorter but frequency is higher, so per passenger it roughly evens out.

The real deal breaker is the lack of compatibility. Can't ever run a maglev train on legacy rail while your high speed train can use the existing system to bridge gaps in the high speed network.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I don’t know why you would want compatibility. The Shinkansen is also always on their own track. Air planes aren’t compatible with train tracks either, so if you look at it more from a perspective of what they’re trying to replace I don’t think it’s that big of a deal.

I think it’s also mainly the start up and build costs, I think the wear of the rails of high speed trains on wheels is very costly

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 24 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

also, monorails of any sort are harder to switch than dual-rail lines, making the networks less flexible.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 26 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well sir, there's nothing on Earth like a genuine, bona-fide, electrified, six-car monorail!

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 4 points 3 hours ago
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't see any problems with switching tracks on this thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyro_monorail