this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
140 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

88272 readers
2631 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A20 Pro vs Intel Ultra 7 Series 3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Actually insane they are beating desktop processors with a phone CPU.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 57 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Not that crazy to beat a desktop CPU in specific category like this. This article went off the deep end when they made the comparison to the Huawei CPU. If you actually put one of these in a phone and spent any amount of time getting the kind of performance they're claiming it would almost immediately thermal throttle or cook itself. These comparisons are pointless.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Toms Hardware is a corporate propaganda op anyway.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Exactly what I wanted to say. On paper my pixel 1 was significantly faster then my pc at the time, an ancient core2quad q8400. In a lot of ways the phone did feel faster, then I tried to decompress a large 7z file on both of them and,despite using a mechanical hard drive, my pc took just over half as long.

Now overall, there were a lot of things that chip could manage better than my desktop but the point is that using a single benchmark or benchmark suite that leans into the strengths of the hardware is pointless.

[–] 3bygone3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

These "benchmarks" are great for marketing, so not pointless. Just pointless for users.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

That would be crazy indeed and might be possible, but the CPU they compared against is a mobile CPU (Intel Core Ultra 355 that is).

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah that’s a different goalpost, but it’s still nuts.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, it's 2 years newer than the AMD architecture, on a better node, and has better memory packaging. I mean it's great they're getting this performance, but wait until Zen 6 for a contemporary architecture and node comparison.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills every time Apple releases a CPU. Their designs are good but most of it is the new TSMC node they use. When others get access to the node the difference is not that large but then the cycle starts again.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Except they aren't, outside of synthetic geekbench benchmark that is designed to produce this exact result...