theunknownmuncher

I would disagree with MBFC's opinion that RFA's credibility is "High" or that its bias is left leaning

Wow.

I'm not aware of specific bans or rules for this community beyond what is in the sidebar. It says that sources with Low or Very Low credibility rating from MBFC will be removed. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drop-site-news-bias-and-credibility/ Drop Site News has a Mostly Factual rating, 2 notches above Low, so I'd assume it would be allowed? 🤷

Edit: I checked RFA ratings on MBFC and it's "High" credibility with "Left-Center" bias. LOL!!!

Radio Free Asia

🤦

It just added a hash of the password to your posts so that others could verify which user made the post. These hashes were easily cracked though. The username could be anything you want. There was no account creation

So here's your chance to clarify your statement and represent it the way you intended

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_Comments

Your choice example of technology to support IP laws is.... something that was created publically and is a collection of open, public standards 🤦🤦🤦 do you think the internet is patented...? By who??? Lmao

The internet is literally the peak example that proves IP laws are unnecessary for innovation and actually inhibits it. And yes, good observation that IP laws predate the internet. They are antiquated by it and no longer relevant in a post-internet world.

No no no the world has always worked the way my flawed ideology requires!!!!

that technology never would have existed in the first place

Oh gee, a wildly incorrect assumption

So... what, are you denying that open source software exists because people have to pay bills...?