this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
129 points (97.8% liked)

World News

41953 readers
494 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Either way, OP is correct. The linked article talks about power capacity, not energy produced. This jackass decided to come in and call another website a "Wikipedia source," misquote a completely different and irrelevant energy stat by 4 orders of magnitude, using a power unit, and bring some kind of attitude with it.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

This jackass decided to come in and call another website a “Wikipedia source,”

Think about this for literally five seconds you fucking moron.

Does wikipedia link to itself as a source?

What do you think the word 'source' means?