this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
571 points (98.0% liked)
Programmer Humor
33385 readers
1055 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
- If the mod doesn't find it funny, you're banned. Ha-ha!... For real: do not use the community for "statements". There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
a fraction is being too kind to us
from what I've heard from my software engineer friends, a decent coder with standard knowledge of CS and the language they're using will always write better (more optimized, more debuggable, etc.) code than currently available LLMs
even if the "fraction" is closer to 1 than 0, the heavy lifting here is done by "look what they need." vibe coders need gigantic climate destroying machines to write code that isn't as good as what an educated programmer writes running on a burrito and coffee
Depends on your domain. Devops is mostly a solved problem terraform is well documented and most infra follows a far more simple pattern. It’s not replacing engineers but if you aren’t a moron it can be a 5x type tool. It is extremely good diagnosing issues, parsing logs, and frankly writing well formed TF. It’s garbage at architecture and every once in a while it’ll absolutely send you a wtf were you thinking type pr. But it’s 80% good with a 20x in raw velocity.
Our team has fixed up a lot of shitty technical debt, increased automation and our deterministic scripts and workflows, and increased usable test coverage on $30/mo copilot plans.
The big problem is that sometimes it's "good" at diagnosing issues and sometimes it's very bad and in both cases it looks the same if you don't have a way to know yourself.
I've seen some of the fodder people consider 'well formed playbooks' and it's also a bit of a crapshoot there. It can speed up some tedium, but so many users get in over their heads.
Today had a junior proudly provide an untested playbook that just did everything wrong and even if it did what it purported to do, it would have been hard coded to certain things that are not what we want to do.