this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
609 points (90.0% liked)

memes

22876 readers
2642 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, Blockchain is really the prime example of a solution looking for a problem. Everything you can do with Blockchain can be easier done using less ressources with other techniques. It sounds fine on paper, and as you said there might be some esoteric use for it someday in the future.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If the blockchain already exists and used the resources yes it was horrible. But what really is the argument to say it's bad to use the one already generated. You don't have to use any more resources to make it. Essentially copy paste of a prime number that was already found right? Maybe I don't understand how they work well enough

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem with blockchain is that everything you can do with it can also be done with a good database. In the case of crypto, it also means that you have to download THE ENTIRE THING SINCE IT STARTED if you want to run a full node capable of validating transactions. The Bitcoin Blockchain was - as of September 2025 - 674GB in size, adding a gigabyte every few days, meaning it is probably around 750GB today, stored on every single full node - what a waste of space. Databases are a lot more flexible in that regard.

[–] musicalphysics@discuss.online -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And a centralized database can be modified at will by whoever controls it. Just because you place no value on a distributed ledger that is censorship and fraud resistant doesn’t mean that configuration has no value. Centralized currencies are secured with violence. Blockchains are secured with math.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You can also apply cryptographic functions to make sure database entries are not modified - this is then an issue of transparency and not centralization.

[–] musicalphysics@discuss.online 1 points 6 hours ago

Centralized powers can do whatever they want with the database. You are welcome to transparently watch them do whatever they want without recourse.