Not The Onion

22634 readers

1027 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

116

Ohio man jailed for texting Shrek’s penis to a state senator. Your questions about Shrexting, answered. (www.fire.org)

submitted 2 hours ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] diocesegoldmine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Ik this won't be a popular take because, as evidenced by this very comment section even, critical thinking isn't popular, but this is sexual assault. Sending people porn non-consentually is sexual assault. Yes, even when the person you're sexually assaulting is a piece of shit themselves, is that seriously a hard concept to grasp?? This dude is a piece of shit too if he thinks it's okay to send someone porn without consent.

[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 57 minutes ago

Sexual harassment, not assault

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Did you read the linked article?

If so, could you be so kind as to speak to why you disagree with its unusually thorough and detailed legal analysis of the matter at hand?

The Shrek image may have been crude or vulgar. But in context, there is no serious argument Byrnes sent it to arouse anyone’s sexual interest, let alone that it satisfies the Miller test. Byrnes sent it to another adult, reportedly accompanied by political commentary describing Cirino as “Young Mussolini.” That’s protected political mockery, not obscenity.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Ha! People who can't tell morals from ethics will argue with lawyers and claim the lawyers are fake, all day. No one knows more than a YouTube grad!

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Wym?

Morally, I’m neutral about the act of sending the photo. It’s crass but was sent to a GOP politician, so big shrug.

Ethically, I think it violates the general principle of “don’t be a dick”, but see it as a nothingburger in the grand scheme of things.

Semantically, I don’t think it’s sexual in any way, shape, or form, nor credibly assault. I don’t think the photo as shown in the article is remotely distressing to anyone imaginable except a deeply-repressed GOP closet case.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Nobody coming off well in this story.