Even if it works despite being AI slop that's been developed in a mere 4 days (?) and somehow has all these contributors, I'm not sure I agree with the idea.

It's cool that they went with Rust for it, but I would have much preferred if all that effort went towards improving GIMP and existing open formats.

If it works then I guess it's the same end result at the end of the day, but it would suck if GIMP doesn't end up being the one to put a nail on Photoshop's coffin after all these years of serious development by humans.

Edit: I already see the kneejerk dislikes coming, I'm just interested in starting a conversation about the idea of it, I also dislike the fact that it's AI slop as I already implied. I'd appreciate joining the conversation instead of dislike bombing with no argument.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

God I wish one of these megacorps would bite on suing one of these projects, if only so there is precedent of punishment for AI code-theft. The fact that they won’t touch them for fear of damaging their golden goose means it’s de-facto fair use.

[–] NightFantom@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

Same, and I'd love for copyright to die, except I need capitalism to die first

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have to admit, "AI copyright laundering Mexican standoff" isn't an angle I had considered.

[–] pory@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly it's one of the few scenarios I did consider at the start. On the one hand, your megacorps like Disney (for example) absolutely want to replace human artists with slopbots. On the other hand, Disney does not want Joe Rando to be able to type "make me a Spiderman comic" into the slopbot.