this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2026
898 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

89099 readers
3862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Unpopular opinion:

There are actions that are illegal. Recordings of those actions is illegal. Generated material counts as art. Also movies count as art. If those show an illegal action, it is not illegal. It is art. And should be protected, whether you like it or not. Same category as freedom of speech.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Generally that's still true. No one is being persecuted by the government over this. But Facebook is not the government, and is within their rights to remove objectionable or distasteful material.

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

Facebook doesn't view it as objectionable or distasteful, never has; same guys been running it since its inception as a rate your classmates site. Nothing has changed with the platform, but I do appreciate more people talking about how shitty it is.

[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yes, it is within their rights to delete or allow such content. I just don’t understand why people are upset about this, as this is not the first case, this is happening. And we all should know by now that tech giants and billionaires are the last ones on this planet to have something resembling what I would call morals

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Give me a break with this free speech stuff, as if meta isn't constantly deleting "legal" posts it doesn't like for political or social reasons.

This has nothing to do with legality, it's a question of morality. Meta isn't the government and we can absolutely call them out for their immoral policies.

[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely. I was only talking about the legal aspect. The morality is absolutely questionable. Besides that, it is probably very distasteful as well. I just don’t see the point of being upset about something, that is neither happening the first time, nor was unexpected. It is their platform. They can do whatever they want. And we are free to not use it.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Well, maybe this stuff can be called art or free speech. However, the US constitution only guarantees that the government can't persecute you for your expression. It says nothing about corporations or private individuals.

Facebook is not the government. Facebook can and should do something about hateful material on its platform. People aren't calling for the those posting AI child torture images to be arrested - they just want Facebook to stop spreading their material.

If you decide to use AI to create child torture porn, you should at least be forced to publish it yourself. Why should Facebook help you?

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How does intent play into this?

[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago

Personal, unprofessional opinion: it plays a huge role, when it comes to a possible sentencing. Judges value factors such as intent and remorse, to adjust the sentences. However, it has to come to a case first and for that, something legally questionable has to happen. We are at the stage, where it is probably only morally questionable, but not legally.