this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
337 points (99.4% liked)

World News

47196 readers
2095 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary: Congress has not delegated (and may not delegate) all power over tariff enactment to the president. It would violate the separation of powers.

The Court of International Trade said the U.S. Constitution gives Congress exclusive authority to regulate commerce with other countries that is not overridden by the president's emergency powers to safeguard the U.S. economy.

"The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the President's use of tariffs as leverage," a three-judge panel said in the decision to issue a permanent injunction on the blanket tariff orders issued by Trump since January. "That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [federal law] does not allow it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hefejefe@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This always seemed to be the outcome, I’m just surprised it took this long for the court to speak up? Like hello, it’s been MONTHS of this nonsense.

Time to reign this rogue president in. Congress better do its job, and not let one man break the backbone of American democracy.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

Actual law doesn't work how Taco uses it. Judges can't just declare something is unlawful. There are hearings, procedures, evidence and thought. This is how the law actually works.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This specific court most certainly has very special processes and procedures that other courts don't follow.