this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
12 points (62.5% liked)

Open Source

49656 readers
590 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EU - Germany

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Interstellar_1@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This looks entirely identical to freetube

[–] D3SOX@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe it looks identical on the surface but seems like you haven't actually compared it by using it or looking at the features list on the site. I wanted to move away from using YouTube in the browser but wasn't satisfied with FreeTube as it missed a lot of power-user features I have previously used extensions and userscripts for. To one of my feature-requests (channel-specific playback speed) they just said it's "too niche" (as they do with a lot of them) what brought me to starting the project.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But it isn't based on Invideous, which fails too often to load the Video, because YT actively block it. This client use another system and apart I put the SMplayer as extern Player.

[–] Interstellar_1@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Wait while he consults Claude.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

You can read the technical data in the homepage or in Github, AFAIK an forked YT API (Local API), you can also use the Invidious API, like FreeTube, if you want in the provider settings.