this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
240 points (98.8% liked)

World News

1290 readers
854 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

People keep bringing this up, and it's likely true that most of them dont work anymore, but there is a no way in hell they haven't kept up maintenance on a few.

One tenth of their deployed ones would be 170, and even 17 would be enough to start a nuclear war.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The takeaway should be that they likely don't have the resources to back up their posturing, and are unlikely to try starting a nuclear war because of it (in theory).

Terrorist sizing those warheads don't have to back anything up, their job is done as soon as the bomb goes off.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

90% chance the one they get is a dud, which is comforting.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

But even if they fire a dud, the receiving part will see an incoming ICBM and won't wait to check whether it's a dud out not.