this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
55 points (82.4% liked)

Linux

68054 readers
850 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been using Linux for over 8 months now, and my primary distribution of choice was Debian.

Debian recently conducted a community vote on allowing AI contributions, and it ended up allowing responsible AI contributions.

What is this responsible? How can AI commits be responsible? There are thousands of reasons to not use AI, and the primary reason is AI is a thief.

How did you react to Debian's decision? Did you switch distros? Which one was your option, and why?

Also, when the Linux kernel itself allows AI commits, is there any practicality in a Linux distribution strictly limiting or restricting AI commits?

I have no serious usability issue with Debian now but am concerned about the use of AI even in my Linux distribution. Should I keep going with Debian or consider any other distribution, as I only have 8+ months of experience as a daily Linux user? I tried almost all Linux distros and am comfortable with everything except Void Linux and highly complex ones like Gentoo.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Void isn’t too difficult and is documented well.

I strongly dislike AI but am not a purist. Linux is already a no-go for purists and good luck with the alternatives.

I think the kernel’s policy on AI use is reasonable. As long as a distro or a package isn’t obvious slop and they have a clear policy, I’m okay using it or continuing to use it.

In the meantime, while I mostly use mainstream distros like Fedora and Arch, I’m quite happy that distros like Void exist so that if mainstream Linux ever takes a direction I disagree with, I have alternatives.

In the end, keep perspective. A distribution like Debian allowing for responsible AI use is not the same as the vibe-coded slop that is Omarchy.

[–] Crumpled6273@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Btw, today I tried once again to install Void and successfully installed it on my computer. With 5hrs + concentrated setup, I installed graphic drivers, power management tools, swap and app armor on the system.

Don't know how the experience will be, but this time, with a successful installation, I feel much more satisfied than building arch.

[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

I think my hardware situation is simpler (iGPU). May be why I haven’t had many issues. There is a derivative called Odyssey Linux that makes Void easier. It is very new with a very small community at the moment but I’ve tried it and it makes many things easier.

[–] HouseWolf@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

documented well.

I'm gonna disagree on this point, I tried Void both on a VM and a spare SSD and I found the documentation was lacking. Or in the case of getting pipewire working I had to go to Reddit to find a workaround as none of the official ways to set it up worked on my systems. And it was far from the last time I had to find an undocumented solution to an issue I was facing.

I really like the idea of a completely independent distro purpose built instead of just "scraping the mold off" existing distros. But I had enough headaches with Void that I ended up on Artix, which mostly has worked out the same as Endeavour/Arch which I was using previously.

Hopefully I can try again in the future and have a better time, since I do applaud the developers for multiple reasons.

I use Artix, btw :3

[–] Crumpled6273@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just try to install it and use it for 1 week, and then you know the pain.

Today I tried VoidLinux once again, and after hours of trying to enable audio, I failed and finally built Arch from root. 😐

[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I have it on an old laptop, running Void, that I use every day for ripping physical media. I play all the ripped CD audio back while I rip the next one. I’m far from a Linux power user and I have zero issues. It’s an old ThinkPad and it kinda just works. Maybe I lucked out hardware wise.

[–] HouseWolf@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

after hours of trying to enable audio, I failed

For me running pipewire as a service even with the aid of wireplumber didn't work at all.

I had pipewire as an autostart script in KDE for it to work. ONLY that worked, not even launching it manually from the terminal worked.