this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2026
149 points (99.3% liked)
Not The Onion
22670 readers
1492 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That was a crude sign, regardless. The sign said "Warning! Damage caused by beavers".
This is the end of the article:
From this description, it seems like beavers were building there first, and their constructions were more important to the ecology of the land, so isn't it more correct to say that it's the thing that humans did afterwards that is the damage, and that the beavers' constructions are the ones that are supposed to be there?
Also, even if you think that the beavers are causing damage, it's sort of rude to say that on the sign. If somebody called Daniel Tilles was to drive his car badly and cause damage to a guard rail along a road, are we going to put up a sign saying, "Warning! Damaged caused by Daniel Tilles." I think that would just be rude.