this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
527 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

88899 readers
2692 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eicker@lemmy.world -4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely. AI is an enterprise product - at least: for now. And Anthropic is in the pool position; https://eicker.news/@technews/117443237284007574

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

AI is an enterprise product

I think Google and Meta are well-positioned to provide AI services to regular people, since they both already have a large user base, existing cash flow from other non-AI products (meaning they can subsidize AI features for as long as they need to), and can probably outlast any startup. Google especially easily have enough paid users and advertisers to cover costs for free users.

Most of thr other AI companies will probably all end up focusing on / pivoting towards enterprise use cases though, for the higher prices and stability of long-term contracts.

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. Enterprise is where AI can actually earn its keep: companies will pay serious money if it cuts costs or boosts revenue. Consumer chatbots are mostly a costly distribution strategy for now. The real customers have procurement budgets, not a $20 subscription and a dream.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are Enterprise companies gonna wanna be fucked by hyperscalers the same way they are fucked by Microsoft?

I'd say no, they won't. Without the vendor lock in, it will be cheaper and more secure to run open source models locally on your own hardware.

People are done outsourcing their essential workflows to non-competitive monopoly corporations.

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

The funniest outcome would be hyperscalers spending billions convincing enterprises they need AI, only for those enterprises to deploy open-weight models on their own hardware. After decades of vendor lock-in, »we can run this ourselves« might be the most expensive sentence Microsoft ever hears. However, the reality in many organisations is also that they opt for the supposedly safer choice of turning to a third party, rather than taking action themselves.