this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
316 points (92.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

50264 readers
566 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was originally going to ask how many legal genders there should be, but I fail to see a compelling argument against 0.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aedaz_@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I do think men getting conscripted because they’re men in kinda bullshit.

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Conscription is bullshit. If your war is so unpopular to your people that they aren’t volunteering, then you shouldn’t be at war.

[–] bookmeat@fedinsfw.app 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 3 days ago

I would say that if people don't care about their country and don't want to fight for it it's OK for this country to lose a war.

Back when I lived in Poland, if it was invaded I would be the first one to flee the country. Let the people that want to live there die for it... Now that I live in Spain, if anyone tried to invade, I would definitely join the fight. Well, maybe not if they invaded Catalonia but once they reached Murcia I would be on the front lines.

[–] vsg@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also, if there was a very great threat, people would enlist willingly, making conscription unnecessary.

[–] waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago

You would have to believe that people are willing to sacrifice to protect their communities but people aren't even willing to look at windmills to protect their communities from climate change. Which does not mean they don't want to keep their community as it is, they might just be to afraid and/or selfish to join themselves.

If people were guided by some intristic "goodness" we wouldn't have such a shit society in the first place.

[–] waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago

Meh people aren't really known to do the "right" thing if they would we wouldn't have had war in the first place. Also people might be fully supportive of a war but don't want to get their hands dirty themselves.

The natural conclusion would be that any country forcing its people to fight will probably have an advantage over any country that doesn't and if that country overtakes you you get conscripted anyway.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

There's a funny story here in the US about that. We were trying to pass the Equal Rights Act (ERA) - equal pay for equal work, and some Republican tried to tank it by putting in the bill that women would also be subject to the draft - apparently he figured that was so horrifying it would sink it. Supporters just said "yeah, that seems fair, good idea" and he had to scramble to take that wording out because he had so misjudged the situation. Still managed to sink the bill though:(

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Women can have kids so in times of war men are seen as disposables. You can't rebuild a nation without women but you basically can without men

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That one isn't a feminist law, that's a fascist one, under the fasc ideal "women are too weak to fight!"

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's less "women are too weak" and more "the point if war is to kill off excess young men so there's more young women available for powerful older men"

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Like it or not that women will guaranteed face harsh realities.

Iraq.

A line of "Iraqi military" taking turns at a boy. Nothing you can do about it.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] myyass@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

It's just one example of how fucked up things can get. You're patrol and you see that, you can't do anything because "we're allies to the iraqi army now."

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

It can be both

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've always thought that it's more 'we need more women than men to repopulate our country after the war' as us men are nearly useless when making new life to this planet. But obviously that idea is 'a bit' dated too today.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

It can be all 3 things.

But no matter what, it's outdated