this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
79 points (93.4% liked)
technology
24511 readers
35 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

If you ever had the (dis)pleasure of reviewing code from lowest-bidder outsourced developers in the early 00s, you will understand the garbage LLMs try to shovel into your face with the same exact confidence. It's not just the code that's sloppy; the commits, communication, and even the original author's intent^[that is, if there even is an author under the Simulacrum], can be just as sloppy. This makes review harder because you can't reliably understand the thread of changes because the LLM is hallucinating^[Yes, LLMs hallucinate everything. Some of those hallucinations are useful.] the whole thing. I have to not only check if libraries are made up, but if those libraries are hallucinated and typo squatted by hackers. I have to check if they are using other helper functions I've already written or if they just make up more! Oh the LLM split up a function into several others that are useless on their own and called it refactoring. Or just spinning and spinning and spinning and spinning...
But the thing most frustrating is how much Roguelike development has become. Is Claude going to fix my problem or TPK my repo? Do I just "need another run" to get to my goal? Better CLAUDE.md? Skills? All this yapping from a RNGesus is turning me into a digital Roman.